金 貞任 (2011.9) 既婚子の実親と義理親への非経済的サポート. 稲葉 昭英, 保田 時男 (編)『第3回家族についての全国調査 (NFRJ08) 第2次報告書 第4巻: 階層・ネットワーク』(日本家族社会学会 全国家族調査委員会). 111-130

Bibliographical Information

Category:
NFRJ Publication
Number:
nfrj08_201104_7
Author:
金 貞任 || Jung-Nim KIM
Date:
2011.9
Title:
既婚子の実親と義理親への非経済的サポート || Married Children Giving Nonfinancial Support to Parents and Parents-in-law
Source:
稲葉 昭英, 保田 時男 (編)『第3回家族についての全国調査 (NFRJ08) 第2次報告書 第4巻: 階層・ネットワーク』(日本家族社会学会 全国家族調査委員会) || INABA Akihide, YASUDA Tokio (eds.) Second Report of the National Family Research of Japan, 2008 (NFRJ08) Volume 4: Social Stratification / Social Networks (Committee on the National Family Research (NFRJ), the Japan Society of Family Sociology
Page:
111-130
URL:
http://nfrj.org/pdf/nfrj08_201104_7.pdf
Abstract:
本研究では、既婚子の実親と義理親に対する非経済的サポートの提供の規定因を明らかにした。その際には、実父母と義父母に対する非経済的サポートの提供がバランス型であるかどうかについて既婚子どもの性別に基づき検討した。
研究の方法として、分析対象者は実父と義父が健在である既婚男女、実母と義母が健在である既婚男女であった。分析に用いるデータは、2008年全国家族社会調査の結果であった。実父母と義父母の非経済的サポートの規定因を明らかにするために、ロジスティック回帰分析を行った。
分析の結果、既婚男女はともに義父母よりも実父母への非経済的サポートの提供の割合が高く、非経済的サポートがインバランス型であることが示唆された。二項ロジスティック分析結果、実父母と義父母への非経済的サポートの提供には、既婚男女ともに実父と義父にそれぞれ配偶者がいない群、実父と義父からそれぞれ手伝いの受領があった群が規定因であった。実母と義母への非経済的サポートの提供には、既婚男女ともに実親と義理親から手伝いの受領があった群、女性のみ実母と義母の配偶者がいない群が規定因であった。それ以外に、既婚男性は、実兄・姉がいない群が実父に対して、実母の配偶者がいない群が実母に対して非経済的サポートを提供していた。既婚女性は、実兄・姉がいない群と実親との居住距離が30分未満の群が実母に対して非経済的サポートを提供しており、義母に対しては孝行意識が強い群が非経済的サポートを提供していることが確認された。|| The purpose of this study was to clarify the nonfinancial support to parents and parents-in-law (PIL) by their married sons and daughters. This study also clarifies whether it is balanced type of nonfinancial support to give support between their parents and parents-in-law by gender bias of married men and women. Balanced type means whether married children don’t give or give same nonfinancial support to both parents and PIL.
This data are based on the results of the National Family Research of Japan Survey (NFRJ08) conducted from January to February 2009. To compare the difference in nonfinancial support to parents and PIL, this study has limited the sample to married men and women whose father and / or father-in-law, or mother and / or mother-in-law are still alive.
The result of the analysis shows that the percentage of married men and women giving nonfinancial support to their parents was higher than the percentage giving financial support to PIL and it was an imbalanced type between parents and in-laws. The result of the binary logistic regression analysis indicated that the traditional values of Japan was effect to given nonfinancial support to parents and PIL and indicated unbalanced it by gender in married children’s. Married men and women who have a single father and a single father in-law, and received helping support from parents and PIL gave nonfinancial support to their father and father in-law, respectively. Married men and women who received helping support from parents and PIL gave nonfinancial support to their mother and mother in-law, respectively. Married men who are the eldest among the siblings, provide nonfinancial support to their father; and those who have a single parent gave nonfinancial support to their mother. Married women who are the eldest among the siblings and have closest geographic proximity to their parents have strong predictors of giving nonfinancial support to their mother. In addition, married women who have a strong filial piety gave nonfinancial support to their mother-in-law.
Addressing the variable of gender, married men and women gave the same nonfinancial support to their father and in-law, and thus it is a balanced type. Furthermore, married men and women gave more nonfinancial support to their mother than to their mother-in-law, thus, it is an unbalanced type.
Keywords:
非経済的サポート, 性別, バランス型, 実親, 義理親 || nonfinancial support, gender, balance type, parents, parents in-law
Note:
NCID=BB06732454
Relation:
| nfrj08_201104 |
Dataset:
[NFRJ08]
Created: 2012-02-20. Updated: 2012-03-28.

コメントは受け付けていません。